{"id":944,"date":"2014-12-16T09:39:35","date_gmt":"2014-12-16T08:39:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/?p=944"},"modified":"2024-07-17T09:56:48","modified_gmt":"2024-07-17T07:56:48","slug":"can-we-reconcile-different-capacity-adequacy-policies-with-an-integrated-electricity-market","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/can-we-reconcile-different-capacity-adequacy-policies-with-an-integrated-electricity-market\/","title":{"rendered":"Can we reconcile different capacity adequacy policies with an integrated electricity market?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the present European Union debate, many consider capacity remuneration mechanisms (CRM) as useless and, if they are eventually considered as useful, there is a necessity of total alignment of capacity adequacy policies in time. We develop an opposite position. The adoption of CRM is a necessity because the market and regulatory failures to invest in peaking units, which are amplified by the large, scale development of intermittent sources by out-of-market policies. Then, provided that some minimal harmonization is sought by regulators and TSOs, each member state should have some freedom in the adoption of his capacity adequacy policies.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"In the present European Union debate, many consider capacity remuneration mechanisms (CRM) as useless and, if they [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-944","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-publications-en","category-working-papers-en"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/944","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=944"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/944\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":947,"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/944\/revisions\/947"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=944"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=944"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=944"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}