{"id":1363,"date":"2019-03-10T09:51:19","date_gmt":"2019-03-10T08:51:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/?p=1363"},"modified":"2024-09-10T09:57:47","modified_gmt":"2024-09-10T07:57:47","slug":"impact-of-gate-closure-time-on-the-efficiency-of-power-systems-balancing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/impact-of-gate-closure-time-on-the-efficiency-of-power-systems-balancing\/","title":{"rendered":"Impact of gate closure time on the efficiency of power systems balancing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>This paper focuses on market design options for operational balancing management in self-dispatch electric<br \/>\npower systems. In particular, it investigates the most relevant timing for the balancing gate closure, when<br \/>\ncompetitors&#8217; decisions on the setting of controllable assets are neutralized and this responsibility is simultaneously<br \/>\ntransferred to the system operator. This discussion is central in the development and implementation of<br \/>\nthe European Electricity Balancing Guideline. Based on a multi-level simulation tool with a realistic modelling of<br \/>\nshort-term power system operations, this paper proposes the first quantitative assessment of postponing the<br \/>\nbalancing gate closure time from 1 h to 15 min ahead of the imbalance settlement period. For different environments<br \/>\n(energy mix, power plant capabilities, outages, etc), the results highlight that postponing the balancing<br \/>\ngate closure time from 1 h to 15 min increases the operational cost of the system. Based on robust and<br \/>\nscalable results, we show that this difference is mainly due to a better coordination of the available resources by<br \/>\nthe central decision maker.<\/p>\n<p>Energy Policy 129, 2019<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"This paper focuses on market design options for operational balancing management in self-dispatch electric power systems. In [&hellip;]","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,26],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1363","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-publications-en","category-journal-articles"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1363","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1363"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1363\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1367,"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1363\/revisions\/1367"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1363"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1363"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ceem-dauphine.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1363"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}